Dakota Newfie
02-13 09:33 AM
Schedule A is basically limited to nurses and physiotherapists - I have not heard of any others being included. Radiology professions (MRI, CT techs, etc.) are in high demand but are not include, though i don't know why?
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi Diecast Model Cream 1/24
pappu
06-26 09:53 AM
I know IV is doing its best and there are other groups fighting for HR 5882.
But honestly, what are the chances for this bill to succeed this year (before election)?
100% or 75% or 50% or 25% or 0%
Ron Gotcher predicts that none of the individual bills may pass this year.
And also that EB3 I may not move forward even next year!
I am not sure how many EB3 (I) volunteers are there in IV (who are really focussed). Are they getting nothing? The prediction is that EB3 I may go back to Nov 2001 and stay there for a while (or may be for the rest of next year).
Is the efforts of EB3 (I) volunteers being exploited (indirectly, of course)? What are they fighting for?
Here are some of my own personal thoughts:
How can one tell a percentage number for something to pass? What kind of data can we base our calculations on?
Who said EB3 India will not forward next year? Did DOS say that? An individual lawyer is not Dept. Of State. I would like to see a written proof from DOS saying this so that we can plan ahead.
There were many naysayers for the July 2007 bulletin. But IV was able to get it current again. So stop believing in predictions and believe in yourself.
I believe it is immigrants more than anyone who will benefit the most from the success of IV's efforts. Thus it is in our interest to make IV successful.
Everyone is free to take part in IV campaigns. Nobody is being 'exploited'. However, if we had a more massive effort for admin fixes, we could have seen better results. With only around 5K letters (and that too a lot of anonymous ones) you cannot expect something to happen quickly. If you are trying to convey a plight of hundreds of thousands that you need hundreds of thousands of letters.
Likewise if you need these bills to move, we cannot expect a couple hundred calls to bring a bill on the floor.
IV is IV members. It is what each IV member decides to do that decides the fate of any campaign. The contributions received during the campaign also decides how much we can invest in our lobbyists. During the past 2 months we were able to collect only $16656 (refer this thread (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18790)). You can do your math and figure how much we can lobby when we have opposition that can spend much more.
IV can be successful only when its members want it to be.
But honestly, what are the chances for this bill to succeed this year (before election)?
100% or 75% or 50% or 25% or 0%
Ron Gotcher predicts that none of the individual bills may pass this year.
And also that EB3 I may not move forward even next year!
I am not sure how many EB3 (I) volunteers are there in IV (who are really focussed). Are they getting nothing? The prediction is that EB3 I may go back to Nov 2001 and stay there for a while (or may be for the rest of next year).
Is the efforts of EB3 (I) volunteers being exploited (indirectly, of course)? What are they fighting for?
Here are some of my own personal thoughts:
How can one tell a percentage number for something to pass? What kind of data can we base our calculations on?
Who said EB3 India will not forward next year? Did DOS say that? An individual lawyer is not Dept. Of State. I would like to see a written proof from DOS saying this so that we can plan ahead.
There were many naysayers for the July 2007 bulletin. But IV was able to get it current again. So stop believing in predictions and believe in yourself.
I believe it is immigrants more than anyone who will benefit the most from the success of IV's efforts. Thus it is in our interest to make IV successful.
Everyone is free to take part in IV campaigns. Nobody is being 'exploited'. However, if we had a more massive effort for admin fixes, we could have seen better results. With only around 5K letters (and that too a lot of anonymous ones) you cannot expect something to happen quickly. If you are trying to convey a plight of hundreds of thousands that you need hundreds of thousands of letters.
Likewise if you need these bills to move, we cannot expect a couple hundred calls to bring a bill on the floor.
IV is IV members. It is what each IV member decides to do that decides the fate of any campaign. The contributions received during the campaign also decides how much we can invest in our lobbyists. During the past 2 months we were able to collect only $16656 (refer this thread (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18790)). You can do your math and figure how much we can lobby when we have opposition that can spend much more.
IV can be successful only when its members want it to be.
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. RE: 1971 Dodge Charger RT Hemi
kate123
02-25 02:40 PM
I completely agree with you on this... But please note that JULY FIASCO DID HAPPEN... If it is against the law or if it is STRICTLY interpreted in the law then CIS or DOS would have never allowed to file for AOS during July 2007.
Also, please see section E from http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3258.html
If you see highlighted text below... one thing strikes me... It is not just availability of the visa numbers which decides when an applicant can file for AOS, infact to utilise visa numbers efficiently they made dates 'C' during July 2007...
In other words It is up to CIS and/or DOS to move the dates...
E. EMPLOYMENT-BASED VISA AVAILABILITY DURING THE COMING MONTHS
All Employment Preference categories except for Third �Other Workers� have been made �Current� for July. This has been done in an effort to generate increased demand by Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) for adjustment of status cases, and to maximize number use under the annual numerical limit. However, all readers should be alert to the possibility that not all Employment preferences will remain Current for the remainder of the fiscal year. Should the rate of demand for numbers be very heavy in the coming months, it could become necessary to retrogress some cut-off dates for September, most likely for China-mainland born and India, but also possibly for Mexico and Philippines. Severe cut-off date retrogressions are likely to occur early in FY-2008.
Again, I am not trying to argue here. I am just trying to see from all the angles.
Please correct me if I mis understood some thing.
Thanks,
Kiran
Read this pdf
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/VisaBulletinUpdate17Jul07.pdf
that will answer your question.
______________________
Not a legal advice
US citizen of Indian origin
Also, please see section E from http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3258.html
If you see highlighted text below... one thing strikes me... It is not just availability of the visa numbers which decides when an applicant can file for AOS, infact to utilise visa numbers efficiently they made dates 'C' during July 2007...
In other words It is up to CIS and/or DOS to move the dates...
E. EMPLOYMENT-BASED VISA AVAILABILITY DURING THE COMING MONTHS
All Employment Preference categories except for Third �Other Workers� have been made �Current� for July. This has been done in an effort to generate increased demand by Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) for adjustment of status cases, and to maximize number use under the annual numerical limit. However, all readers should be alert to the possibility that not all Employment preferences will remain Current for the remainder of the fiscal year. Should the rate of demand for numbers be very heavy in the coming months, it could become necessary to retrogress some cut-off dates for September, most likely for China-mainland born and India, but also possibly for Mexico and Philippines. Severe cut-off date retrogressions are likely to occur early in FY-2008.
Again, I am not trying to argue here. I am just trying to see from all the angles.
Please correct me if I mis understood some thing.
Thanks,
Kiran
Read this pdf
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/VisaBulletinUpdate17Jul07.pdf
that will answer your question.
______________________
Not a legal advice
US citizen of Indian origin
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi
gcfunstarts
07-01 10:36 PM
Everyone reading this message, please call and make a real difference.
Just take a few minutes break from your work and make a cal which is as simple as calling the number, no wait times and the person over the phone is friendly and you leave a message with them!
Your participation will move these phone call number really up and will reach the appropriate people. Call and be a part of the campain.
Thank You!
Just take a few minutes break from your work and make a cal which is as simple as calling the number, no wait times and the person over the phone is friendly and you leave a message with them!
Your participation will move these phone call number really up and will reach the appropriate people. Call and be a part of the campain.
Thank You!
more...
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi.
vipulgarg
03-04 02:05 PM
Hello All,
I am on H1 Visa and I am planning to go for further studies and converting my H1 to F1.
Now after completing my studies, can I use same H1 petition from Old Quota or I have to apply again in Fresh H1 Quota.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Thanks and Regards,
Vipul Garg
I am on H1 Visa and I am planning to go for further studies and converting my H1 to F1.
Now after completing my studies, can I use same H1 petition from Old Quota or I have to apply again in Fresh H1 Quota.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Thanks and Regards,
Vipul Garg
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 「1970 Dodge Charger RT hemi c
vparam
09-25 09:13 AM
I left a well reputed MNC due to fragomen. This company division had no prior experiance in GC and fragomen took over a year to file my case which got into the BEC dump....I was happy with the company and vice versa but got nailed big time due to fragomen...:mad:
more...
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. Dodge Charger 1970 (personal)
sanan
06-14 08:53 AM
Yes they do!
I have the same question - Do dependent spouses get EAD even if dates retrogress after applying for I-485?
I have the same question - Do dependent spouses get EAD even if dates retrogress after applying for I-485?
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger R/T
GooblyWoobly
07-16 12:58 PM
Hi,
I was not able to find a good answer for my question below from the search, so I posting again.
•Is the Service Center processing dates based on Received Date or Notice date on the I 485 Receipt Notice??
Received date
•Also I see many times people talking about Receipt Date is it Received date or Notice Date On the I 485 Receipt Notice??
Received date.
I was not able to find a good answer for my question below from the search, so I posting again.
•Is the Service Center processing dates based on Received Date or Notice date on the I 485 Receipt Notice??
Received date
•Also I see many times people talking about Receipt Date is it Received date or Notice Date On the I 485 Receipt Notice??
Received date.
more...
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger R/T 426
Totoro
05-16 11:29 AM
Great work toro , the article was very good...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24567987/page/2/
So do we have any update on this, will it be possible to get SSN for H4 dependents?
So far things are looking good, but I have been instructed to not discuss any specifics until the lawyers have reviewed all the information. I should know more next week. I also received a call yesterday from a congressional office, but I was unavailable to take the call. We'll see what happens.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24567987/page/2/
So do we have any update on this, will it be possible to get SSN for H4 dependents?
So far things are looking good, but I have been instructed to not discuss any specifics until the lawyers have reviewed all the information. I should know more next week. I also received a call yesterday from a congressional office, but I was unavailable to take the call. We'll see what happens.
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger R/T 426
gc_coming
01-12 06:19 PM
Hi All,
I got a notice from uscis on sept 24th stating that my 485 has been withdrawn as my previous employer withdrew my 140. I filed in july 2007 , and ported to a new job in April 2008. I filed an MTR on 24th Sept, but the status of the MTR is still received and pending. Its going to be 180 days since my 485 has been withdrawn on march 9th. And my lawyer is saying that i have to leave this country if we dont get the MTR accepted before 180 days.
Gurus could you please suggest some ideas on all possible steps that can be taken..
Thanks
I got a notice from uscis on sept 24th stating that my 485 has been withdrawn as my previous employer withdrew my 140. I filed in july 2007 , and ported to a new job in April 2008. I filed an MTR on 24th Sept, but the status of the MTR is still received and pending. Its going to be 180 days since my 485 has been withdrawn on march 9th. And my lawyer is saying that i have to leave this country if we dont get the MTR accepted before 180 days.
Gurus could you please suggest some ideas on all possible steps that can be taken..
Thanks
more...
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger Drive By
kcforgc
06-04 02:58 PM
I hope they have some kind of link with DOL. Because my approved labor case status changed from Certified to Data Review and back to Certified.
Where did you see the change in case status? Do you have access to the PERM system? Are you the employer/representative of the firm responsible for PERM??
thanks
Where did you see the change in case status? Do you have access to the PERM system? Are you the employer/representative of the firm responsible for PERM??
thanks
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi
Sachin_Stock
06-14 03:53 PM
I had applied for I-140 in march 2007 in regular processing (not premium). its in nebraska center which i think is taking quite a long time. should i hurry this up by upgrading to premium and then apply for 485?? i dont want to wait cuz who knows those 485 dates might retrogress in a couple of months.
i wud highly appreciate any recommendations/suggestions.
thanks
i wud highly appreciate any recommendations/suggestions.
thanks
more...
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1971 Dodge Charger RT Hemi Is
singhsa3
07-14 03:43 PM
Personally I think there are no more than 8000 applications left. How I arrived at this number..
Total EB1+EB2 visas = 80,000
Per Quarter allocation= 20,000
Discount factor for dependants = 2.5
Application Left = 20,000/2.5 = 8,000
So the question is how many application are left before Jun'06?
Total EB1+EB2 visas = 80,000
Per Quarter allocation= 20,000
Discount factor for dependants = 2.5
Application Left = 20,000/2.5 = 8,000
So the question is how many application are left before Jun'06?
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger Registry
SmSm
12-01 11:00 AM
The more I think about free MATH tutoring the more it makes sense. It conveys what we are really good at, "MATH", "Sciences", which unfortunately a lot of people lack here in this country. Gets the SKIL bill agenda in focus.
May be can get to the "No Child Left Behind" eyes and ears.
May be can get to the "No Child Left Behind" eyes and ears.
more...
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Charger 500/ RT/440/Hemi
ramaonline
07-09 05:38 PM
This is in response to the poster indicating that H1B cap includes h4 time. This was changed in the 2005 interim AC21 memo which decouples h1b and h4 visa status durations. H1 Time does not include time spent on H4. Anyone on h4 can always get a new h1b term for 6 years.
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger R/T 426
chanduv23
09-25 12:59 PM
Continued from previous post
EOIR-44 �Immigration Practitioner Complaint Form� � Individuals who seek to file a disciplinary complaint against an immigration practitioner who practices before EOIR and/or DHS may file a Form EOIR-44. The form assists the investigating counsel in EOIR or DHS in determining on a preliminarily basis what action, if any, should be taken based upon the allegations raised in the complaint, including whether to conduct a preliminary inquiry, request additional information from the complainant, and/or refer the complaint to a State bar disciplinary authority.
In addition, the form provides complete filing instructions (on the back) and information on confidentiality, disciplinary complaint procedures, and formal disciplinary proceedings.
It is important to note that a Form EOIR-44 is not required in order to file a complaint. Individuals may write and submit their own complaint statement or letter according to the instructions in the �Questions and Answers� section below.
EOIR-45, �Immigration Practitioner Appeal Form from an Adverse Decision of an Adjudicating Official in Practitioner Discipline Case� � Immigration practitioners must use Form EOIR-45 to appeal to the BIA an adverse decision of an Adjudicating Official regarding a disciplinary proceeding. The form provides filing instructions and information regarding:
Right to representation by an attorney or representative (at no expense to the Government),
Submission of briefs and service on the opposing party (including addresses of service),
The BIA�s summary dismissal grounds,
Oral arguments and how they may be requested, and
Required notification of change-of-address.
All four forms are available at all Immigration Court locations, the BIA, and DHS offices, at no cost. In addition, the forms may be downloaded from the Internet. EOIR forms can be accessed on the EOIR Web site at http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/formslist.htm.
Any person may file duplicates of the forms, provided that any such duplication must conform exactly to font size and type of the Government-issue original and be printed on standard 8� x 11-inch bond paper.
* * * * *
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
For Complainants:
Q. How do I make a complaint against my attorney or representative?
A. If the complaint concerns the conduct of an attorney or representative in a matter before the Immigration Court, BIA, or DHS, you may complete a Form EOIR-44, �Immigration Practitioner Complaint Form� but it is not required. You may write your own complaint statement or letter. This statement or letter must include.
Your name and address,
The attorney�s or representative�s name and address,
An explanation of the circumstances and details of your complaint, and
Your signature.
Along with your Form EOIR-44 or your own complaint statement or letter, you may also submit supporting documents and information, such as:
Correspondence between you and your attorney or representative,
Documents concerning the underlying immigration case (including the case name and number), and
Copies of filings in connection with the case.
Neither EOIR nor DHS can accept complaints over the telephone.
Q. Where do I send a complaint against my attorney or representative?
A. If the complaint concerns the conduct of an attorney or representative in a matter before EOIR (the Immigration Courts or the BIA), send your Form EOIR-44 or your own complaint statement or letter to:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Office of the General Counsel
ATTN: Bar Counsel
5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600
Falls Church, VA 22041
If the complaint concerns the conduct of an attorney or representative in a matter before DHS, send your Form EOIR-44 or your own complaint statement or letter to:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
70 Kimball Avenue, Room #103
Burlington, VT 05403
Q.Where can I get the EOIR-44 complaint form?
A. You may obtain an EOIR-44 complaint form from any Immigration Court, the BIA, and DHS offices. In addition, the form may be downloaded from the Internet. EOIR forms can be accessed on the EOIR Web site at http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/formslist.htm.
Q. After I file a complaint, what will happen next?
A. Your complaint will be reviewed by the investigating office to determine whether it warrants further investigation, and, if so, an investigation will be conducted. If, after completing the investigation, the investigating office determines that a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Practitioners has occurred, a Notice of Intent to Discipline will be issued and then sent to the attorney or representative, including a recommendation that discipline be imposed.
Q. Will I have to testify against my attorney or representative?
A. You may be called to testify if a hearing is held. Your testimony may be important in determining whether your attorney or representative violated the Rules of Professional Conduct for Practitioners.
Q. Can you get my money back for me and find another attorney to represent me?
A. EOIR cannot:
Require your attorney to give you your money back,
Force your attorney to act for you or tell your attorney how to proceed with your case,
Give you legal advice about your case or otherwise represent you, or
Recommend a particular attorney or law firm who might help you.
EOIR can give you a list of free legal service providers located in your area. The �Free Legal Service Providers� list is posted by State on the EOIR Internet Web site at http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/probono/states.htm.
For Practitioners:
Q. What if one of my clients files a frivolous complaint against me?
A. Every complaint will be investigated thoroughly. If the investigation concludes that no violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Practitioners has occurred, the matter will be closed. Except under limited circumstances, complaints are kept confidential.
Q. Am I entitled to be represented by counsel in a disciplinary proceeding?
A. You are entitled to be represented by counsel at no expense to the Government, or, if you so choose, you may represent yourself.
Q. Where do I get the notice of appearance forms (EOIR-27 and EOIR-28), the complaint form (EOIR-44), and the appeal form (EOIR-45) for a practitioner discipline case?
A.These forms can be obtained from any Immigration Court, the BIA, and DHS offices. In addition, the forms may be downloaded from the Internet. EOIR forms can be accessed on the EOIR Web site at http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/formslist.htm.
EOIR-44 �Immigration Practitioner Complaint Form� � Individuals who seek to file a disciplinary complaint against an immigration practitioner who practices before EOIR and/or DHS may file a Form EOIR-44. The form assists the investigating counsel in EOIR or DHS in determining on a preliminarily basis what action, if any, should be taken based upon the allegations raised in the complaint, including whether to conduct a preliminary inquiry, request additional information from the complainant, and/or refer the complaint to a State bar disciplinary authority.
In addition, the form provides complete filing instructions (on the back) and information on confidentiality, disciplinary complaint procedures, and formal disciplinary proceedings.
It is important to note that a Form EOIR-44 is not required in order to file a complaint. Individuals may write and submit their own complaint statement or letter according to the instructions in the �Questions and Answers� section below.
EOIR-45, �Immigration Practitioner Appeal Form from an Adverse Decision of an Adjudicating Official in Practitioner Discipline Case� � Immigration practitioners must use Form EOIR-45 to appeal to the BIA an adverse decision of an Adjudicating Official regarding a disciplinary proceeding. The form provides filing instructions and information regarding:
Right to representation by an attorney or representative (at no expense to the Government),
Submission of briefs and service on the opposing party (including addresses of service),
The BIA�s summary dismissal grounds,
Oral arguments and how they may be requested, and
Required notification of change-of-address.
All four forms are available at all Immigration Court locations, the BIA, and DHS offices, at no cost. In addition, the forms may be downloaded from the Internet. EOIR forms can be accessed on the EOIR Web site at http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/formslist.htm.
Any person may file duplicates of the forms, provided that any such duplication must conform exactly to font size and type of the Government-issue original and be printed on standard 8� x 11-inch bond paper.
* * * * *
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
For Complainants:
Q. How do I make a complaint against my attorney or representative?
A. If the complaint concerns the conduct of an attorney or representative in a matter before the Immigration Court, BIA, or DHS, you may complete a Form EOIR-44, �Immigration Practitioner Complaint Form� but it is not required. You may write your own complaint statement or letter. This statement or letter must include.
Your name and address,
The attorney�s or representative�s name and address,
An explanation of the circumstances and details of your complaint, and
Your signature.
Along with your Form EOIR-44 or your own complaint statement or letter, you may also submit supporting documents and information, such as:
Correspondence between you and your attorney or representative,
Documents concerning the underlying immigration case (including the case name and number), and
Copies of filings in connection with the case.
Neither EOIR nor DHS can accept complaints over the telephone.
Q. Where do I send a complaint against my attorney or representative?
A. If the complaint concerns the conduct of an attorney or representative in a matter before EOIR (the Immigration Courts or the BIA), send your Form EOIR-44 or your own complaint statement or letter to:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Office of the General Counsel
ATTN: Bar Counsel
5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600
Falls Church, VA 22041
If the complaint concerns the conduct of an attorney or representative in a matter before DHS, send your Form EOIR-44 or your own complaint statement or letter to:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
70 Kimball Avenue, Room #103
Burlington, VT 05403
Q.Where can I get the EOIR-44 complaint form?
A. You may obtain an EOIR-44 complaint form from any Immigration Court, the BIA, and DHS offices. In addition, the form may be downloaded from the Internet. EOIR forms can be accessed on the EOIR Web site at http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/formslist.htm.
Q. After I file a complaint, what will happen next?
A. Your complaint will be reviewed by the investigating office to determine whether it warrants further investigation, and, if so, an investigation will be conducted. If, after completing the investigation, the investigating office determines that a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Practitioners has occurred, a Notice of Intent to Discipline will be issued and then sent to the attorney or representative, including a recommendation that discipline be imposed.
Q. Will I have to testify against my attorney or representative?
A. You may be called to testify if a hearing is held. Your testimony may be important in determining whether your attorney or representative violated the Rules of Professional Conduct for Practitioners.
Q. Can you get my money back for me and find another attorney to represent me?
A. EOIR cannot:
Require your attorney to give you your money back,
Force your attorney to act for you or tell your attorney how to proceed with your case,
Give you legal advice about your case or otherwise represent you, or
Recommend a particular attorney or law firm who might help you.
EOIR can give you a list of free legal service providers located in your area. The �Free Legal Service Providers� list is posted by State on the EOIR Internet Web site at http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/probono/states.htm.
For Practitioners:
Q. What if one of my clients files a frivolous complaint against me?
A. Every complaint will be investigated thoroughly. If the investigation concludes that no violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Practitioners has occurred, the matter will be closed. Except under limited circumstances, complaints are kept confidential.
Q. Am I entitled to be represented by counsel in a disciplinary proceeding?
A. You are entitled to be represented by counsel at no expense to the Government, or, if you so choose, you may represent yourself.
Q. Where do I get the notice of appearance forms (EOIR-27 and EOIR-28), the complaint form (EOIR-44), and the appeal form (EOIR-45) for a practitioner discipline case?
A.These forms can be obtained from any Immigration Court, the BIA, and DHS offices. In addition, the forms may be downloaded from the Internet. EOIR forms can be accessed on the EOIR Web site at http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/formslist.htm.
more...
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1969 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi
amitjoey
05-20 12:27 PM
Numbers matter- If we want to be heard- we need to send the emails in 1000's
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Challenger R T Hemi
Totoro
05-11 09:24 PM
If your planning to go to Court, then gather the names from every body.
I will contribute my buck and names for this.
It is a little early for that. I was told the lawyers reviewing this case will get back to me shortly. I will let you know as soon as I hear anything.
I will contribute my buck and names for this.
It is a little early for that. I was told the lawyers reviewing this case will get back to me shortly. I will let you know as soon as I hear anything.
1970 dodge charger rt hemi. FM3 1970 Dodge Charger RT
Springflower
12-19 10:25 AM
Hi,
I got 2 year EAD from NSC in August 2008.
Wanted to apply for Advance Parole (second time).
Is NSC issuing 2 year AP's ?
Wondering if any body got Advance Parole for 2 years from NSC.
Also, I appreciate if any one can share their experince about INFOPASS to get Advance Parole in case of emergency
(if one did not apply for AP & need to travel urgently).
Thenk you for your help!
I got 2 year EAD from NSC in August 2008.
Wanted to apply for Advance Parole (second time).
Is NSC issuing 2 year AP's ?
Wondering if any body got Advance Parole for 2 years from NSC.
Also, I appreciate if any one can share their experince about INFOPASS to get Advance Parole in case of emergency
(if one did not apply for AP & need to travel urgently).
Thenk you for your help!
skynet2500
05-30 09:53 PM
Excerpts from same site http://pubweb.fdbl.com/news1.nsf/9abe5d703b986cff86256e310080943a/9c1274840ebee3c3852572eb006fde98?OpenDocument
Reallocation of Immigrant Visa Numbers
Immigrant visa quotas would be substantially realigned under S. 1348. Our current law provides for a baseline annual quota of 140,000 immigrant visas for foreign nationals immigrating on the basis of employment. In the past several years, a backlog has developed in several employment-based immigrant categories, with multiyear waits for some prospective immigrant workers. The Senate bill would, in the first five years after enactment, increase the quota for merit-based and employment-based cases, in part to address existing backlogs. An estimated 247,000 numbers would be available for work-related immigration. Beginning in the sixth fiscal year after enactment, however, the quota would drop to 140,000 numbers per year. This level would remain in place for at least two years, until approximately the eighth year after enactment, when the quota would rise to a baseline of 380,000 per year, with additional numbers made available for previously undocumented immigrants who become eligible to apply for permanent residence.
Is the interpretation of current Bill (without amendment) is correct for the work related immigration?
This looks like good news. This says work related immigration would get 247000 instead of 90000. Who is misinterpreting the bill?
Reallocation of Immigrant Visa Numbers
Immigrant visa quotas would be substantially realigned under S. 1348. Our current law provides for a baseline annual quota of 140,000 immigrant visas for foreign nationals immigrating on the basis of employment. In the past several years, a backlog has developed in several employment-based immigrant categories, with multiyear waits for some prospective immigrant workers. The Senate bill would, in the first five years after enactment, increase the quota for merit-based and employment-based cases, in part to address existing backlogs. An estimated 247,000 numbers would be available for work-related immigration. Beginning in the sixth fiscal year after enactment, however, the quota would drop to 140,000 numbers per year. This level would remain in place for at least two years, until approximately the eighth year after enactment, when the quota would rise to a baseline of 380,000 per year, with additional numbers made available for previously undocumented immigrants who become eligible to apply for permanent residence.
Is the interpretation of current Bill (without amendment) is correct for the work related immigration?
This looks like good news. This says work related immigration would get 247000 instead of 90000. Who is misinterpreting the bill?
mittal_a
06-27 09:24 AM
Tsc
No comments:
Post a Comment